Section 149:
Independent director
·
An independent director is someone who does not have any material or pecuniary
relationship with the company or directors.
·
MD or WTD
of company can’t be considered as independent director.
·
CG may prescribe the minimum number of independent directors for class of public
companies.
·
Listed public company shall have at least 1/3rd of the total
number of directors as independent directors.
·
Rules 4 of Companies Rules, 2014 mandates the
requirement of at least two independent
directors for the following public
companies:
-> Which is having paid up share capital of Rs. 10 crore or more; or
->Which is having turnover of Rs. 100 crore or more; or
->Which have, in aggregate, outstanding loans, debentures and deposits, exceeding Rs. 50
crore.
·
An independent director shall possess appropriate skills, experience and
knowledge in one or more fields of finance, law, management, sales,
marketing, administration, research, corporate governance, technical operations
or other disciplines related to the company’s business.
·
According to section 149(6), following persons are eligible to be
appointed as independent director:
-> A person who is not a MD or WTD or nominee director.
->Person of integrity
and possesses relevant experience and
expertise in opinion of board.
-> A person who
is or was not promoter of company, its holding, subsidiary or associate
company.
-> A person who is not related to promoter or director of company, its holding or
subsidiary or associate company.
-> A person who or whose relative has no pecuniary relationship with company,
its holding company or subsidiary company or associate company or their
promoters, or directors, during last 2 financial years or during the current
financial year.
-> A person none
of relative has or had pecuniary relation or transaction with the company,
its holding, subsidiary or associate company or their promoters, or directors, amounting to 2% or more of its gross
turnover or total income of Rs. 50 lacs, whichever is lower, during the 2
immediate preceding financial year or during current financial year.
->Who, neither
himself nor any of his relatives:
-
holds or has held the position of a KMP or employee of the company or its holding,
subsidiary or associate company in any of the 3 immediate preceding financial
years;
-
is or has been an employee or proprietor or a partner, in any of the 3 financial
years immediately preceding the financial year in which he is proposed to be
appointed, or
-
a firm of
auditors or company secretaries in practice or cost auditors of the company
or its holding, subsidiary or associate company; or
-
any legal
or a consulting firm that has or had any transaction with the company, its
holding, subsidiary or associate company amounting
to 10% or more of the gross turnover of such firm;
-
holds together with his relatives 2% or more of the total voting power of
the company; or
-
is a Chief
Executive or director, by whatever name called, of any NPO that receives 25% or
more of its receipts from the company, any of its promoters, directors or
its holding, subsidiary or associate company or that holds 2% or more of the
total voting power of the company.
·
Independent directors are not required to be retired by rotation.
·
The tenure
of the independent directors must
not exceed two consecutive periods of 5 years each, and can be extended for
a second term only after a SR and disclosure of such appointment in the Board’s
report.
·
Section 149(11) mandates that reappointment
after the expiry of second term can be done only after a cooling period of 3 years.
·
During
the cooling off period of 3 years, independent
directors can’t be appointed in or be associated with the company in any other
capacity, either directly or indirectly.
·
The Act expressly disallows independent directors from obtaining stock options and
remuneration other than sitting fees and reimbursement of travel expenses for
attending the board and other meetings.
·
Profit
related commission may be paid to independent directors subject to the approval of the shareholders.
·
The Act specifically provides that they can be
implicated only for offences committed
with their knowledge, connivance or negligence.